Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Celine Naef vs Kamilla Rakhimova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naef vs Rakhimova analysis and find out who is favored!
Celine Naef vs Kamilla Rakhimova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naef 0 - 0 Rakhimova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naef has won 46.81% of points on their second serve, while Rakhimova has won 45.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naef, in recent form, has won 55.24% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rakhimova has won 57.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.41% and 35.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naef has saved 55.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rakhimova has saved 51.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naef has won 50.88% of matches played (W/L 29/ 28), with Rakhimova winning 49.12% (W/L 28/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 6/ 5). Rakhimova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 40/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.97% of matches (W/L 23/ 16), where as Rakhimova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 196.05 while Rakhimova has played against players with an average rank of 181.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naef has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rakhimova has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naef has converted 44.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rakhimova has converted 45.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
171
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
108
Rank
65
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
66% (88-46)
Career Total W/L
59% (196-137)
51% (18-17)
YTD W/L
47% (16-18)
$173,282
Career Prize Money
$790,771
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Celine Naef vs Kamilla Rakhimova For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Naef VS Rakhimova
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Celine Naef | Kamilla Rakhimova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 51% (18/17) | 47% (16/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (43/37) | 45% (33/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (387/346) | 46% (325/374) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 38% (6/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 107 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 162 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:7 | 1:41:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.69 | 155.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1446/2386) | 55% (1310/2370) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (949/1446) | 61% (795/1310) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (440/940) | 46% (485/1060) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (132/298) | 45% (118/261) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1065/2406) | 43% (988/2284) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 58% (7/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (16/12) | 55% (6/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 51% (18/35) | 44% (14/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 40% (4/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 13% (16/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 6% (16/1) | 11% (18/2) |
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Celine Naef
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Celine Naef
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Celine Naef
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
66 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Celine Naef
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Daria Saville
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kamilla Rakhimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
45%
(
25 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
20 of
53)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
51%
(
28 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(1) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
49 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
57 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Camilla Rosatello
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve %
36%
(
5 of
14)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
11
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Taylor Townsend
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
10
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Daria Saville
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Naef Vs Rakhimova Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Naef are available here and Rakhimova photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
